問題ID: 4521

  • フォーラムは新サイトへ移行しました。
  • このフォーラムではゲスト投稿が禁止されています
前の投稿 - 次の投稿 | 親投稿 - 子投稿.1 .2 | 投稿日時 2014-11-15 21:28
tsussie0926  半人前   投稿数: 7
i checked mistakes 4521
answer
DSW1 HSRP
change "standby 10 track 1 decrement 30"
to "standby 10 track 5 decrement 30"

but i wonder DSW1
"track 5 ip route ""100.2.1.2 255.255.255.255""....."

100.2.1.2 is wrong ip adress.
前の投稿 - 次の投稿 | 親投稿 - 子投稿.1 | 投稿日時 2014-11-15 21:53
tsussie0926  半人前   投稿数: 7
i recommend "100.2.1.2 255.255.255.255"
to "10.1.4.4 255.255.255.252"
前の投稿 - 次の投稿 | 親投稿 - 子投稿なし | 投稿日時 2014-11-15 22:26 | 最終変更
arashi1977  長老 居住地: 広島  投稿数: 1715
100.2.1.2 is DSW1's Loopback0 address, and this tracking object does not decrement HSRP priority (connected route 100.2.1.2/32 exists in "show ip route" output).
This ticket need to fix unexpected HSRP priority decrement, so we should choice track object 5 to not to decrement priority.

And there is no information about DSW1's failure.
(DSW1's Fa0/1 down, RouterD's Fa1/0 down, DSW1 down, etc.)
If DSW1's failure means DSW1 down, answer can solve this ticket.

As you say, track ip route 10.1.4.4/30 is better in real, but this is EXAM. If presented answer can solve the ticket, is there any problems?

hope your help
前の投稿 - 次の投稿 | 親投稿 - 子投稿なし | 投稿日時 2014-11-24 9:27
tsussie0926  半人前   投稿数: 7
hi arashi1977, thank you for your reply and i could not comment.
i understood you answer. thanks!

  >フォーラム検索へ


Copyright (c) 2020 Ping-t All rights reserved.