Re: 問題ID： 4521
Re: 問題ID： 4521
msg# 1.1.1
ゲスト
投稿数: 0
100.2.1.2 is DSW1's Loopback0 address, and this tracking object does not decrement HSRP priority (connected route 100.2.1.2/32 exists in "show ip route" output).
This ticket need to fix unexpected HSRP priority decrement, so we should choice track object 5 to not to decrement priority.
And there is no information about DSW1's failure.
(DSW1's Fa0/1 down, RouterD's Fa1/0 down, DSW1 down, etc.)
If DSW1's failure means DSW1 down, answer can solve this ticket.
As you say, track ip route 10.1.4.4/30 is better in real, but this is EXAM. If presented answer can solve the ticket, is there any problems?
hope your help
This ticket need to fix unexpected HSRP priority decrement, so we should choice track object 5 to not to decrement priority.
And there is no information about DSW1's failure.
(DSW1's Fa0/1 down, RouterD's Fa1/0 down, DSW1 down, etc.)
If DSW1's failure means DSW1 down, answer can solve this ticket.
As you say, track ip route 10.1.4.4/30 is better in real, but this is EXAM. If presented answer can solve the ticket, is there any problems?
hope your help
投稿ツリー
-
問題ID： 4521
(ゲスト, 2014-11-15 21:28)
-
Re: 問題ID： 4521
(ゲスト, 2014-11-15 21:53)
-
Re: 問題ID： 4521
(ゲスト, 2014-11-15 22:26)
-
-
Re: 問題ID： 4521
(ゲスト, 2014-11-24 9:27)
-
